<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of a QSO Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qsoparty.com/uncategorized/death-of-a-qso-party.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qsoparty.com/uncategorized/death-of-a-qso-party.html</link>
	<description>Details about making the most of the many QSO Parties</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KI4FW</title>
		<link>http://www.qsoparty.com/uncategorized/death-of-a-qso-party.html/comment-page-1#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>KI4FW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qsoparty.com/?p=91#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>There was no compelling demand for a mid-Atlantic QSOP.  The two regional QSOPs are the New England QSOP, which brings together small states with few counties, and gives county-hunters a reason to participate.  And there&#039;s the 7-area QSOP, which groups together states with lots of counties, but few operators.  The mid-Atlantic states have neither of these issues -- each state can hold its own QSOP (perhaps with the exception of DE) and draw a crowd from within state and beyond.  It was a ill-conceived idea from the start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no compelling demand for a mid-Atlantic QSOP.  The two regional QSOPs are the New England QSOP, which brings together small states with few counties, and gives county-hunters a reason to participate.  And there&#8217;s the 7-area QSOP, which groups together states with lots of counties, but few operators.  The mid-Atlantic states have neither of these issues &#8212; each state can hold its own QSOP (perhaps with the exception of DE) and draw a crowd from within state and beyond.  It was a ill-conceived idea from the start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG3V</title>
		<link>http://www.qsoparty.com/uncategorized/death-of-a-qso-party.html/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>KG3V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qsoparty.com/?p=91#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that another contributing factor is that nobody feels ownership of a regional QSO party? I know in our State, there is a great deal of enthusiasm because everybody will be lining up to work VA stations. A regional QSO party sounds like a good idea, but maybe operators don&#039;t feel like this is their personal &quot;special&quot; event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that another contributing factor is that nobody feels ownership of a regional QSO party? I know in our State, there is a great deal of enthusiasm because everybody will be lining up to work VA stations. A regional QSO party sounds like a good idea, but maybe operators don&#8217;t feel like this is their personal &#8220;special&#8221; event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
